Scripture reveals Jesus to be a man of many titles. For example, one of the most frequent titles used in relation to Jesus is Son of God. But what does this designation mean? Can it be used synonymously with the title God the Son as is so often the case in Churches today? Indeed, under the instruction of Trinitarian pastors, teachers and leaders, we have become accustomed to treating these two titles as equivalent. This tradition is so pervasive that often when we read the words Son of God in our Bibles we subconsciously replace them with God the Son. We then think this association is “proof” of Jesus’ deity.
Son of God
Hastings’ Dictionary of the New Testament speaks about this Son of God-God the Son synthesis when it says,
“…the title ‘Son of God’ is now appropriated to the Second Person of the Trinity; and the ordinary reader of the Bible assumes this to be the meaning wherever he finds the phrase. He has only, however, to read with a little attention to perceive that this is an assumption which ought not to be made without inquiry, because in Scripture there are many ‘sons of God.’”[1]
Although the fusion of the terms Son of God and God the Son is used to prove Jesus’ deity, it is important to understand that this was not always the orthodox view.
Scripture speaks of many sons of God
As noted above, Scripture speaks of many sons of God. Angels, who are created beings that carry out God’s will,[2] are said to be “sons of God.” The first use of the phrase is found in the book of Genesis. While there is some discussion as to exactly who these sons of God were, it is agreed that they were angelic beings created by God.
Genesis 6:1-2 (NASB) Now it came about, when men began to multiply on the face of the land, and daughters were born to them, 2 that the sons of God saw that the daughters of men were beautiful; and they took wives for themselves, whomever they chose. (emphasis added)
We also see “sons of God” used in the book of Job for angels who presented themselves before the Lord.[3] In addition, even pagans referred to angelic beings as sons of God as seen in King Nebuchadnezzar’s response to seeing one “like a son of the gods” in the fiery furnace with Shadrach, Meshach and Abed-nego. The king then blessed the God of these faithful young men because He “sent His angel and delivered” His servants.[4]
We’ve just begun to examine Scripture and yet it is already clear from just these few examples that the title son(s) of God is not reserved for deity.
Kings are called sons of God
In addition to angels, humans are also referred to in Scripture as sons of God since they were designated by God to rule on His behalf. In Genesis 1:26, God gave Adam dominion over the earth. Not only was he the first “king”[5] he was also given the designation son of God.
Luke 3:38(NASB)38 the son of Enosh, the son of Seth, the son of Adam, the son of God. (emphasis added)
Furthermore, we see the kings of Israel were given this appellation. God told the prophet Nathan to deliver a message to King David about future kings who would rule as sons of God.
1 Chronicles 17:11-14(NASB)”When your days are fulfilled that you must go to be with your fathers, that I will set up one of your descendants after you, who will be of your sons; and I will establish his kingdom. 12 “He shall build for Me a house, and I will establish his throne forever. 13 “I will be his father and he shall be My son; and I will not take My lovingkindness away from him, as I took it from him who was before you. 14 “But I will settle him in My house and in My kingdom forever, and his throne shall be established forever.“‘” (emphasis added)
Nathan’s prophecy had a dual application. David’s son, who we find out later is Solomon, will be called God’s son, and will be given the throne of his father David. A future king, also a descendant of David, will be God’s son as well, and he, too, will be given a kingdom, albeit an eternal one.[6]
When Solomon becomes king he is called God’s anointed[7], which in Hebrew is mashiach, and in English is translated messiah. Thus, we see that Solomon is called both God’s son and the anointed king or messiah. According to scholars, this is an obvious parallel to Jesus, the future messiah king and Son of God.
Thus Solomon, the idealized king of Israel’s golden age, is in Chronicles both called ‘Messiah’ and given the promise that he will be God’s son; and since God establishes his kingdom forever, the promise logically should apply to any faithful royal descendant. It would seem a short step from this conjunction of sonship and Messiahship in Solomon to the designation of the future Messiah as God’s Son.[8]
This theme can be found in the gospels as well. The angel Gabriel told Mary she would play a role in the fulfillment of the prophecy made to King David centuries before:
Luke 1:31-35 (NASB)”And behold, you will conceive in your womb and bear a son, and you shall name Him Jesus. 32 “He will be great and will be called the Son of the Most High; and the Lord God will give Him the throne of His father David; 33 and He will reign over the house of Jacob forever, and His kingdom will have no end.” 34 Mary said to the angel, “How can this be, since I am a virgin?” 35 The angel answered and said to her, “The Holy Spirit will come upon you, and the power of the Most High will overshadow you; and for that reason the holy Child shall be called the Son of God. (emphasis added)
According to this Scripture, Jesus would be called the Son of God, not because he is God the Son, but because of his miraculous conception in the womb of a virgin, and because he would be the fulfillment of the prophecy made to King David. Just as Solomon was God’s son and messiah (king), so Jesus would be called Son as the future Messiah.
In addition to the powerful testimony of Luke 1:31-35, there are other passages that reveal the meaning of “Son of God.” For example, Nathanael communicates clearly what “Son of God” meant to first century Jews:
John 1:47-51 (NASB)47 Jesus saw Nathanael coming to Him, and *said of him, “Behold, an Israelite indeed, in whom there is no deceit!” 48 Nathanael *said to Him, “How do You know me?” Jesus answered and said to him, “Before Philip called you, when you were under the fig tree, I saw you.” 49 Nathanael answered Him, “Rabbi, You are the Son of God; You are the King of Israel.” (emphasis added)
Nathanael provides us with an example of what Encyclopaedia Britannica calls a “synonymous parallelism,” which is, a literary device that “involves the repetition in the second part of what has already been expressed in the first, while simply varying the words.”[9] Let’s apply this to Nathanael’s understanding of who Jesus was:
You are the Son of God [first part] , You are the King of Israel [first part repeated using different words]
In other words, Son of God is synonymous with King of Israel. There is absolutely no connection to Jesus’ supposed deity in this passage.
Scripture provides us with yet another example. The high priest presiding over Jesus’ trial persistently asked Jesus who he was. During that exchange, we read that the high priest had the same understanding of “Son of God” as Nathanael did:
Matthew 26:62-66 (NASB) 62 The high priest stood up and said to Him, “Do You not answer? What is it that these men are testifying against You?” 63 But Jesus kept silent. And the high priest said to Him, “I adjure You by the living God, that You tell us whether You are the Christ, the Son of God.” (emphasis added)
Christ or Christos in the Greek means anointed. It’s the Greek equivalent to the Hebrew mashiach or messiah. Thus, Christ, Messiah and the king of Israel are all synonymous terms that can, according to Scripture, be used interchangeably with the title Son of God when used of Jesus.
Again, the gospel of Luke provides us with still one more example of what the title “Son of God” means.
Luke 4:40-41 (NASB)40 While the sun was setting, all those who had any who were sick with various diseases brought them to Him; and laying His hands on each one of them, He was healing them. 41 Demons also were coming out of many, shouting, “You are the Son of God!” But rebuking them, He would not allow them to speak, because they knew Him to be the Christ. (emphasis added)
We would agree that demons know exactly who Jesus is. But instead of shouting that he is God the Son or God clothed in flesh, they declare him to be the Son of God, a synonym for the Christ. In fact, when Jesus encountered demons in an unrelated event just a few verses earlier, they reached the same conclusion regarding his identity:
Luke 4:34-35 (NASB) [demon speaking] “Let us alone! What business do we have with each other, Jesus of Nazareth? Have You come to destroy us? I know who You are—the Holy One of God!” (emphasis added)
The demon did not say, “I know You are the Holy God,” but “I know You are the “Holy One of God.” Clearly, in both instances, the demons knew Jesus to be the Messiah whom God sent and nothing of his supposed deity.
We find another powerful example in the gospel of Matthew:
Matthew 16:13-20 (NASB) 13 Now when Jesus came into the district of Caesarea Philippi, He was asking His disciples, “Who do people say that the Son of Man is?” 14 And they said, “Some say John the Baptist; and others, Elijah; but still others, Jeremiah, or one of the prophets.” 15 He *said to them, “But who do you say that I am?” 16 Simon Peter answered, “You are the Christ, the Son of the living God.” 17 And Jesus said to him, “Blessed are you, Simon Barjona, because flesh and blood did not reveal this to you, but My Father who is in heaven…20 Then He [Jesus] warned the disciples that they should tell no one that He was the Christ. (emphasis added)
In direct response to the question regarding Jesus’ identity, once again, Son of God is found to be synonymous with Christ (i.e. the Messiah) with absolutely no mention of divinity; a revelation that came directly from God.
Neither Nathanael, the high priest, the demons or Peter–who was under divine inspiration–interpreted Son of God to mean anything other than Christ, that is the Messiah, the promised king. And according to Biblical scholar and popular author, N.T. Wright, this is exactly what the early Church believed:
“Messiah”, or “Christ’, does not mean ‘the/a divine one”. It is very misleading to use the words as shorthands [sic] for the divine name or being of Jesus. It is comparatively easy to argue that Jesus (like several other first-century Jews) believed he was the Messiah. It is much harder, and a very different thing, to argue that he thought he was in some sense identified with Israel’s God. In this context, the phrase ‘son of God’ is systematically misleading because in pre- and non-Christian Judaism its primary referent is either Israel or the Messiah, and it retains these meanings in early Christianity…[10]
Theology professor and author Douglas McCready agrees:
While some have used the title Son of God to denote Jesus’ deity, neither the Judaism nor the paganism of Jesus’ day understood the title in this way. Neither did the early church.[11]
The Biblical record never tells us that Son of God is the equivalent of God the Son. In fact, the term God the Son never appears in Scripture. Never.
Sadly, even secular sources sometimes better reflect Biblical truths than do the traditions of the Church. Wikipedia in its entry entitled, “Son of God” states that the title is “Not to be confused with God the Son.”[12] Further still, it quotes Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary’s position when it says that “As applied to Jesus, the term is a reference to his role as the Messiah, the King chosen by God.”[13]
Christians are Called Sons of God
The last application to be made with regard to the meaning of Son of God is to those who follow Jesus. Numerous times in the New Testament Christians are referred to as God’s sons.[14]
John 1:12 (KJV) But as many as received him [Jesus], to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name (emphasis added)
Galatians 3:26(NASB)For you are all sons of God through faith in Christ Jesus. (emphasis added)
Just as Adam and Solomon were sons of God who ruled as kings, so we too, as sons and daughters of God by faith in Jesus, will rule with Christ in the coming kingdom.[15] A resounding redemption of God’s plan for Adam to rule His creation.[16] The word Adam, by the way is Hebrew for man or mankind.
Daniel 7:27 (NASB)’Then the sovereignty, the dominion and the greatness of all the kingdomsunder the whole heaven will be given to the people of the saints of the Highest One; His kingdom will be an everlasting kingdom, and all the dominions will serve and obey Him.’ (emphasis added)
Revelation 3:21-22 (NASB)21 ‘He who overcomes, I will grant to him to sit down with Me on My throne, as I also overcame and sat down with My Father on His throne. 22 ‘He who has an ear, let him hear what the Spirit says to the churches.'” (emphasis added)
Revelation 20:6 (NASB) 6 Blessed and holy is the one who has a part in the first resurrection; over these the second death has no power, but they will be priests of God and of Christ and will reign with Him for a thousand years. (emphasis added)
Are all Sons of God created equal?
Although there are many sons of God[17] Jesus is to be esteemed above them all for he is the “only begotten son of God.”[18] He is so stylized because he is the only man to be miraculously conceived in the womb of a virgin by the power of the Holy Spirit. And he is the only man designated by God to be the promised Messiah who, having been exalted to God’s right hand for his obedience unto death,[19] was given the authority to reign as king over all the earth.[20] Indeed, every knee will bow and declare him to be Lord to the glory of the Father. What Adam, the first son of God and ruler over the earth failed to do, Jesus, the Last Adam and greatest Son of God, accomplished. As such, Jesus will reign on earth for 1,000 years before handing the kingdom back over to the Father that God may be all in all.[21]
Neither Scripture or the first century Church viewed the title Son of God as proof of Jesus supposed deity. It was never seen as a synonym with the non-Biblical phrase, God the Son. Indeed, it is an anachronism from the 4th century A.D. that has unfortunately heavily influenced our understanding of who Jesus is. Thus, it is imperative that we allow the Biblical record its proper place as arbiter of truth. Now is the time to restore the Biblical meaning to the title Son of God, that it may accurately reflect the truth of Scripture, and point more clearly to Jesus, the Christ and soon coming king.
[1] “Son of God,” Hastings’ Dictionary of the New Testament, accessed 4-15-19, StudyLight.org, https://www.studylight.org/dictionaries/hdn/s/son-of-god.html
[2] Psalm 103:20
[3] Job 1:6 and 2:1 NIV translates “sons of God” as “angels
[4] Daniel 3:25 and 28. Jesus is not the angel of the Lord as evidenced by Hebrews 1:4-5, 13-14.
[5] “God created man to be His kingdom agent, to rule and subdue the rest of creation, including the aggressive satanic forces, which would soon infringe upon it.” The Spirit Filled Bible (NKJV), Jack W. Hayford, general ed., (Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson, 1991), p 5
“[Man] was to be God’s responsible representative and steward on earth, to work out his Creator’s will and fulfill the divine purpose. World dominion would be granted to this new creature….This sublime creature, with his unbelievable privileges and heavy responsibilities, was to live and move in a kingly fashion.” The Wycliffe Bible Commentary, (Chicago, IL: Mood Press, 1990), p 4
[6] Daniel 7:13-14
[7] 2 Chronicles 6:42
[8] Ermine Huntress, “‘Son of God’ in Jewish Writings Prior to the Christian Era.” Journal of Biblical Literature, vol. 54, no. 2, 1935, pp. 120-121., www.jstor.org/stable/3259680.
[9] “Ketuvim,” Encyclopaedia Britannica, accessed 04-17-19, https://www.britannica.com/topic/biblical-literature/The-Ketuvim#ref1096330
[10] N.T. Wright, “Jesus’ Self-Understanding” NTWrightPage – blog post accessed on 4-15-19 http://ntwrightpage.com/2016/04/05/jesus-self-understanding/
[11] Douglas McCready, He Came Down From Heaven, (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 2005), p. 56
[12] “Son of God,” Wikipedia, accessed 4-16-19, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Son_of_God
[13] Merriam-Webster’s, Collegiate Dictionary, 10th ed. (Springfield, MA: Merriam-Webster, 2001), accessed 04-16-19, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Son_of_God
[14] See also: Matthew 5:9, 13:38; Luke 20:34-36; Romans 8:14-15, 19
[15] Christians will reign with Jesus: 2 Timothy 2:11-12; Revelation 20:6; 22:5
[16] Genesis 1:26
[17] Hebrews 2:10
[18] John 1:14; 18, 3:16, 18; and 1 John 4:9
[19] Philippians 2:8-11; Ephesians 1:20-22
[20] Daniel 7:13-14
[21] 1 Corinthians 15:20-28
I am impressed with the work you have done on this subject! What a blessing!
Thank you for your kind words! Praise God for using this site to bless you! May He continue to watch over you and bless you in the new year!
Jesus referred to Himself as being the Bride-Groom. How am I to understand Him caling Himself the Bride-Groom since Yahweh is the Bride-Groom/Husband of Israel?
Thank You,
Steve
Hi Steve,
Thanks for the question. The key to understanding the significance of God and Jesus both being referred to as a bridegroom is to remember that the Bible uses countless metaphors to help the reader understand a variety of matters. For example, light is a prevalent Biblical motif. God is said to be light (1 John 1:5), and Jesus is said to be the light of the world (John 8:12; 9:5). One might be tempted to conclude that because God and Jesus are both said to be light, it must mean that Jesus is God. However, this would be a faulty conclusion since not everything or everyone that shares a metaphor can be understood to share an identity or essence. For instance, Jesus said that believers are also the light of the world (Matthew 5:14). Are we to conclude that Christians share the same identity or essence as Jesus? Of course not.
Another example can be found in my most recent post (8-16-20), Does Being King of Kings Mean Jesus is God? Some erroneously conclude that because God and Jesus are both referred to as King of kings, it’s proof that Jesus is God. However, in the article, I reference other men who bear the very same moniker. Thus, a shared title or metaphor is not an indicator of a shared identity or essence.
With regard to the use of the term bridegroom to describe both God to Israel and Jesus to the Church, the same caution must be applied when drawing conclusions. Neither God nor Jesus is the literal bridegroom in the temporal sense of the word. Rather, bridegroom is a metaphor used to express various elements of a covenant relationship, such as fidelity, devotion, compassion, as well as emotions, such as joy, that are to be found in a relationship. In Hosea 2:19-20, for example, God uses the metaphor of a bridegroom who has betrothed himself in lovingkindness, compassion and faithfulness to his bride, Israel. Does this mean that God is literally Israel’s husband? That God somehow married His creation? No, rather it is a way to use what is familiar to help us understand God’s character and commitment to His people.
Because analogies such as that of a bride and bridegroom, banquets, weddings, etc. are so often used in Scripture to express a variety of emotions, life situations, and spiritual truths–even the sun is said to be like a bridegroom (Psalm 19:1-6;)–it’s not surprising that the Messiah is spoken of using these same metaphors. For instance, Isaiah writes that the coming messiah is clothed with garments of salvation like a bridegroom decks himself with a garland (Isaiah 61:1,10).
John the Baptist also uses this familiar metaphor to describe his relationship to the Messiah. The former is the friend of the bridegroom (i.e. groomsman), who has an important, but lesser role in God’s plan of redemption. While the latter, who is the bridegroom, has the greater role (John 3:28-30).
Paul also uses a betrothal metaphor to describe how believers in Corinth have strayed from their devotion to Christ. The apostle writes, “…for I betrothed you to one husband, so that to Christ I might present you as a pure virgin” (2 Corinthians 11:1-4). Does this mean that Paul is literally the match-maker while Jesus is a literal groom who is married to the church in Corinth? Of course, not. It is simply a literary device to help his readers understand the seriousness of their commitment, or lack thereof, to the Christ.
One last example to illustrate the use of metaphors is found in Revelation where we are told about the coming marriage supper of the Lamb and his bride (Revelation 19:7-10). In Revelation 21:9, the Church is said to be the wife of the Lamb (without reference to God). Does this mean that we are literally the spouse of an animal? I think we would agree that these are metaphors used to describe the special relationship we have with the anointed one of God who, according to God’s plan, willingly became the sacrifice for our sins.
In conclusion, the use of the same bridegroom metaphor for God and Jesus does not mean that both are God, anymore than being called the light of the world means we are the Christ.
Hope this helps. God bless!
Do we throw out the book of John? Serious question because the book is filled with statements that affirm Jesus’ Diety. John explicitly stated that the Word was with God and the Word was God. And then Thomas calls Jesus My Lord and my God. The Scripture can not be more clear that Jesus and the Father are one, perfectly united. Jesus is the Alpha and the Omega and so is the Father. The question is do you want to believe that Jesus is YHVH? I am doing a Bible study on the Diety of Christ. It is quite a fascinating study. Let me know your email and I can send it to you when I am finished.
Dustin, thanks for reading and sharing your thoughts.
On the contrary, the book of John, when read through a first century Hebraic lens supports the belief that Jesus is a man attested by God. It was God who worked miracles through His chosen Messiah (Acts 2:22). It is not until the 4th century that a doctrine of Jesus’ deity is developed. You can read more about the evolution of the doctrine and that of the Trinity in this article as well as others here.
I think you will find the articles on John 1:1-3 (Part 1) (Part 2) (Part 3) very enlightening. And the article on Jesus’ statement that he and God are one can be found here. Even John Calvin did not interpret the passage as evidence that God and Jesus are the same substance, but that they were one in purpose or mission. Thomas’ statement is more clearly seen in light of Jesus’ teachings just prior to his arrest and crucifixion. Not to mention the context of passage in question. This article on John 20:28 should provide good food for thought. As for Jesus’ Alpha and Omega statement, which are not proof of deity (God does not have a beginning or an end) this article should prove helpful.
You can find more info on supposed proof texts by checking out the Common Verses tab. Prayers for your continued study on just who does the Bible say Jesus is.